Pin

This summer, I decided to switch to a micro-compact pistol for my everyday carry (EDC). This was a change from the compact EDC I typically carry during the summer months. Why the switch, you might ask? Well, I gained some weight and needed something easier to conceal. I have average size hands, but I like a full grip feel, so I was initially hesitant to use a micro-compact.  After researching and trying these pistols, I was pleasantly surprised. I do have a personal preference between the two, which I’ll share later. In this post we will review dimensions, capacity, and shootability for each pistol. As a disclaimer, the opinions are my own and your preferences may differ based on your own research. I’ll also mention the Sig Sauer P320 X-Carry for comparison to compact carry models.

Size May Not Matter

You may find a difference of opinion on whether Micro-compact is the appropriate term for this size handgun. The size difference between micro-compacts and compact pistols is minimal, and the difference between the two micro-compacts compared here is even less. Although the dimensions are only fractions of an inch apart, I can definitely feel a difference when I carry each of these. The micro-compacts conceal better than the compact model, and between the Hellcat and the X Macro, the Hellcat conceals a bit better. That said, none of these pistols feel uncomfortable, and I haven’t had any issues with brandishing.

For clarity, “brandishing” refers to displaying or exhibiting a weapon in a threatening, angry, or rude manner, or using it in a fight or quarrel. The weapon doesn’t have to be pointed at someone for it to be considered brandishing. Some indicators that someone might be carrying concealed include a gun-shaped bulge at the waistline or a visible outline of the firearm under clothing.

Dimensions

Handgun	Length	Height	Width	Weight
Hellcat Pro	6.6 in	4.8 in	1 in	21 oz
P365 XMACRO	6.6 in	5.2 in	1.1 in	21.5 oz
P320 X-Carry	7.4 in	5.5 in	1.3 in	27 oz

Capacity

Both the Sig Sauer P365 X Macro and the Springfield Hellcat Pro feature double-stack designs, which provide high capacity for micro-compacts. The X Macro holds 17+1 rounds for a total of 18, while the Hellcat Pro holds 15+1, totaling 16 rounds. For some, the extra two rounds may not seem significant, but I prefer the additional capacity, as it could make a difference in a self-defense scenario. When comparing the Sig Sauer P320 X-Carry, you’ll find it has the same capacity as the X Macro, though it’s noticeably larger.

Despite being micro-compacts, the grip size on both the Hellcat Pro and the X Macro feels more like that of a mid- or full-sized pistol. The width of the grip, despite only being 1.1 inches wide, allows me to get a full grip, which improves control.

Shootability

This is where the two pistols really start to separate. Personal preferences guides our decision when choosing an EDC, and mine tend to revolve around trigger pull, recoil, ergonomics, and grip of the handgun. Let’s explore each of these areas.

Trigger Pull

The trigger is the first thing I notice on any firearm, whether it’s a pistol or a long gun. Trigger control is one of the most important fundamentals of marksmanship, whether for competition, tactical use, or a day at the range.

In my opinion, the X Macro has the superior trigger. I prefer flat triggers because they allow for solid finger placement. The X Macro’s trigger has a short take-up and a snappy break, though the reset could be more distinct. Still, the trigger pull is consistent, allowing me to predict how the pistol will perform every time. The slight “squishiness” of the trigger is common in many Sig pistols.

On the other hand, the Hellcat Pro’s trigger is much heavier. For someone who is trigger sensitive this can be a deal breaker when making a choice for a carry weapon. Springfield lists the trigger pull at 7.0 lbs., but in my tests, it averaged 6 lbs, 5 oz. By comparison, the X Macro’s trigger pull averages around 5 lbs, 4 oz. I find the heavier trigger pull on the Hellcat forces me to readjust my grip, which affects my consistency.

Recoil

I had my wife try both pistols to get her opinion on recoil. To my surprise, she handled both quite well. While you can expect some snappiness from 9mm pistols of this size, I found the recoil on both models to be manageable, allowing for solid follow-up shots. The ergonomics of each pistol contribute significantly to their controllability.

Ergonomics and Grip

The X Macro has an extended beavertail and a deep undercut, allowing me to achieve a high, firm grip. The magazine release and trigger are easy to reach, and the pistol doesn’t feel small in my hands. Both pistols come with interchangeable backstraps (small, medium, and large), and I typically use the large backstrap to fill my hand. The grip texture on the X Macro is firm, offering excellent control, especially in wet conditions or when my hands are sweaty. My wife, however, finds the textured grip uncomfortable.

The Hellcat Pro doesn’t have as pronounced a beavertail, but I can still achieve a high grip. The magazine and magazine release are also easy to reach. The grip texture is less aggressive than on the X Macro, and I noticed some movement in my hands while shooting. I was conscious of this and made sure to keep a firm grip to maintain control.

Overall, both pistols offer good ergonomics and grip comfort, making them enjoyable to shoot. There are no major ergonomic differences that would sway me from one to the other.

Conclusion

The purpose of this comparison was not to give preference for one pistol over the other. However, I personally prefer the X Macro over the Hellcat, based on the trigger pull alone. The consistency and feel of the trigger make a significant difference in my shooting experience, providing better control and comfort.

That said, both the Sig Sauer P365 X Macro and the Springfield Hellcat Pro are excellent choices for everyday carry (EDC). They each offer a compact size that makes concealment easy, while still providing high capacity, reliable ergonomics, and shootability that rivals larger pistols. The choice between them comes down to individual preferences, such as how a gun feels in your hand, trigger sensitivity, and even aesthetic considerations.

Whether you prioritize concealment, capacity, or shootability, it’s crucial to find the right balance for your personal needs. If possible, I recommend testing both of these pistols at the range before making a decision. Your EDC is a tool that you should feel confident with, and the best way to ensure that is by selecting the pistol that works best for you.

Related Content