Pin

Not too long ago, I got the itch to own a premium pistol, particularly a 2011-style firearm. I considered several well-respected manufacturers like Staccato and Atlas Gunworks. As someone fairly well-versed in firearms, I knew about these brands but hadn’t explored them deeply. Of course, I experienced sticker shock when I saw their prices. While I wanted a quality 2011, I had champagne taste on a beer budget—not a Miller Lite budget, but still a modest one. I aimed to keep my purchase well under $2,000. After some research, I identified two promising options: the 1911 Springfield DS Prodigy 4.25 and, a few months later, the Bul Armory SAS II TAC 5. Both are well-made pistols, but in my opinion, there are notable differences that make one stand out over the other. This review isn’t a technical breakdown; rather, it’s based on my personal experience with each.

Look and Feel

If you’re interested in the Bul Armory SAS II TAC, you’ve probably discovered how difficult it can be to find in stock. When I was shopping, the only available model had a 5” barrel. I wanted the 4.25” version but had to settle for what I could get. Keep in mind, the Bul’s barrel is longer than the Springfield’s, and is overall a larger pistol, as you review the following observations.

When I first handled each pistol, it was immediately clear they were different from what I’m used to. Although I’ve held many 1911 pistols, these two felt perfect in my hands, as if they were made for me. They’re exceptionally well-balanced. Once I compared them side by side, the Prodigy’s heavier forged steel frame became apparent compared to the SAS’s aluminum frame. Although the Prodigy and a shorter 4.25″ barrel the added weight made its recoil and follow-up shots more manageable. Both pistols’ polymer grips provide a full, satisfying feel in hand. The 1911 grip angle allowed me to achieve a high grip, offering excellent control. The SAS’s double undercut enhanced this further, enabling an even higher grip. While I didn’t mind the Bul’s longer barrel, as I don’t plan to carry it concealed or open, it’s something potential buyers should consider.

In terms of grip texture, the Bul Armory is more aggressive but still comfortable for me. The Springfield’s grip feels wider, though measurements show they’re the same. As you’ll notice, I added an EGW Magazine Well and slide lock to the Prodigy for contrast, opting for aluminum. The SAS comes with a flared magazine well that didn’t require modification. I also prefer the SAS’s slide cuts and bull barrel, which extends past the slide.

While the SAS is a beautiful pistol, its PVC finish—a Physical Vapor Deposition coating—is a drawback. It has a flat black appearance which seems that it would show scratches and blemishes and the pistol gets used. Therefor, I prefer the Prodigy’s black Cerakote finish, which is some what shinny. However, the Prodigy’s Cerakote became a problem when cycling issues arose (more on that in the Shootability section).

Both pistols are visually striking 2011s, but the Prodigy’s weight and wider grip give it a slight edge in feel. Meanwhile, the SAS’s aggressive grip texture and slide design make it equally appealing. Overall, the Springfield Prodigy feels slightly better in hand.

Dimensions

Handgun	Length	Height	Width	Weight
Springfield	7.8 in	5.5 in	1.45 in	32.5 oz
Bul Armory	8.75 in	5.87 in	1.75 in	28.8 oz

Features

Both pistols have ambidextrous extended thumb safety levers, the standard 1911 grip safety and match-grade bull barrels. However, the SAS’s barrel extends beyond the slide, and its slotted slide adds a sleek look while reducing weight and dissipating heat. Both firearms are optic-ready. The Prodigy comes with a plate for the HEX optic, requiring additional plate purchases for other optics. The SAS includes a stainless steel plate with an RMR pattern for optic brands like Holosun and Trijicon RCR. Both have co-witness sights with mounted optics.

The Prodigy features a single-slot accessory rail, whereas the SAS has a four-slot rail, contributing to its lighter weight. The Springfield’s fiber optic front sight is a highlight for me. While I already mentioned the magazine wells, the SAS’s stock magazine well offers better grip leverage. I replaced the Prodigy’s for this reason. Both are removable for reduced printing if carried concealed.

Other notable features include the SAS’s slotted hammer style and aggressive texture, which I prefer. The Prodigy’s hammer is perfectly functional but lacks the same aesthetic appeal. The SAS’s longer beavertail adds to its visual appeal, especially with its stainless finish contrasting against the black frame. While some might find the longer beavertail cumbersome for holstering, it’s not an issue for me since I don’t plan to carry or compete with either pistol.

Shootability

When it comes to shootability, the Bul Armory SAS II TAC clearly outshines the Prodigy. The SAS’s trigger pull is incredibly light, rated by Bul Armory at up to 3.2 lbs. While I haven’t measured it myself, it feels very responsive. The Prodigy’s trigger is slightly heavier, likely closer to 4 lbs., with more take-up before the break. The SAS’s shorter take-up and reset provide superior feedback and control.

Unfortunately, my first range experience with the Prodigy was frustrating. I encountered multiple failures to cycle within the first ten rounds. After researching, I learned that a thorough cleaning might help, so I removed a surprising amount of factory grease and sludge. Despite this, cycling issues persisted. Further research suggested that excess Cerakote could be causing the problem. Springfield’s customer service was excellent, promptly issuing an RMA and repairing the pistol. It took about two weeks for the repair including the shipping. While the issues improved slightly upon its return, I’ve yet to get through a full box of 50 rounds without a failure. Although it has been very accurate and smooth performing when functioning correctly, the reliability issues have been disappointing.

By contrast, the SAS II TAC has been a flawless gem. Its smooth operation feels like it’s running on ball bearings. Which is often stated about it. The SAS is one of the most enjoyable pistols I own. The manageable recoil and excellent balance make follow-up shots and target acquisition a breeze. I’ve been thoroughly impressed, and it’s always fun to see others’ reactions when they shoot it for the first time.

Conclusion

Choosing between the 1911 Springfield DS Prodigy and the Bul Armory SAS II TAC 5 ultimately comes down to personal preferences. The Prodigy stands out with its aesthetic appeal, grip comfort, and balance, making it a great option for those who value design and ergonomics. However, the performance and reliability issues I experienced were a letdown, even though Springfield’s responsive customer service worked to address them.

On the other hand, the SAS II TAC 5 delivered exceptional reliability, a smoother shooting experience, and outstanding craftsmanship right out of the box. Its precision and balanced design make it one of the most enjoyable pistols I own.

Both firearms offer affordable entry points into the world of premium 2011-style pistols, and they each bring unique strengths to the table. For me, the Bul Armory SAS II TAC 5 has earned its place as a favorite due to its consistent performance and shootability. That said, the Prodigy has great potential and, with some fine-tuning, could be a strong contender for any shooter’s collection.

Related Content